Getting and Spending: Gisele's summer splurge

I went shopping with my friend Gisele, a retired executive with a terrific eye for clothes.  

When she worked for a global accounting firm, she had her business clothes made by a tailor, so that every piece fit precisely and coordinated perfectly. She told me, "He said he would never make me a skirt with pockets or pair of trousers with rear pockets because they made les fessiers look larger, and spoiled the line of a skirt."  

My response was that times have changed; now, rear pockets are rarely thought of as undesirable. Their placement does have a visual effect; see this post by The Sewcialists. The tailor may have been catering to his clientele's wish to look as thin as possible; this was the '70s, the era of Dress for Success.

I mentioned the American feminist Anna Jenness Miller (1859-1935) who fought for "dress reform", which meant women's release from heavy corseting.  

Miller chose a middle road for her case, a loosening of the stays rather than refusal. She wanted women to have suitable clothes for athletics, and to reject dresses that dragged in mud. She advocated for proper work clothes, whether for house work or an occupation:  "...each department of work will have its recognized dress, appropriate in detail, self-respecting, because the right thing for our immediate needs, and beautiful because appropriate."

She would have approved of the top on the left below, and been shocked that nearly ninety years after her death, a woman would choose an evening dress in which she could barely walk or breathe.

Left, "Piscine" smock; right, Kim Kardashian in John Galliano

Left: Gamine Workwear "Piscine" smock; now s/o but check Gamine Workwear for well-designed functional clothes. Does not come with a duckling.

Right: Kim Kardashian at the 2024 Met Gala. Does not come with an oxygen inhaler.

Gisele had decided to entirely replace her wardrobe beginning with this summer's clothes, because her daughter suggested she upgrade, saying, "Maman, it's time." She asked me to accompany her; I readily agreed. She is petite but does not seek petite departments, has a clean modern aesthetic and if ever I knew one, is an utter minimalist—but a sucker for scarves and shoes.

This is what she bought at our sole stop, Naif. (Gisele dislikes boutique-hopping and purred at everything at Naif.)


Clothing, left to right: 
Joanna linen top with an embroidered texture that does not show up here.
Millie linen dress (to wear over linen crops or jeans); pockets!
Wilo linen sweater
Domi striped linen pants
Accessory: Kapity bag by Sans Arcidet; a coup de coeur splurge. 

No brights, no prints; she likes the zen side of the linen world but adds colour via scarves. She has many to go with her finds; for those in shopping mode, here are a few I like:


Left to right:
Mangrove cotton scarf from Inoui.
Sendai cotton-linen scarf in terracotta and green from Princesse et Dragon.
Cornflower blue linen scarf from LoganZby Lismount, on Etsy.

The tally: In addition to these things, she's keeping five items she already has: two pairs of trousers, a raincoat, a cotton shirt and a kaftan bought in Mexico. She will add several new cotton tees and maybe another dress if she sees one. This will be her entire summer wardrobe. She's serious; you see daylight between her hangers.

I was impressed by her rapid, confident decisions, which is much easier in a shop that fits your taste exactly. Though my mother's voice said, "Wait for the sale!", Gisele is going to wear everything right now, unburdened by admonitions from beyond. (She has to; she's given away her old clothes.)

Waiting as my friend paid a rather hefty bill, I realized that Anna Jenness Miller's "dress reform"—the theatre of celebrity events aside—has proceeded more markedly she might have imagined. Maybe, I thought, it could be interesting to be laced into a corset simply to appreciate not having to wear one to look respectable.


Comments

Jay said…
No duckling, no sale :)
I wish I had the courage to do this.
I'm muddling along, ostensibly with right number and type of pieces, but I know the age and wear and tear of different pieces detracts from the overall look.

I can wear only cottons and keeping them crisp and fresh is very hard.
Murphy said…
Pretty clothes! I could never be that minimal, especially in summer, unless I did laundry every other day and wore clean clothes damp off the drying rack. But it’s fun to enjoy it vicariously!
Duchesse said…
Jay: Some cottons are easier to care for than others, I just bought one of those waffle ewaves that’s lovely. By a Quebec brand I will look up when I am home.
Avicennia: Please call store to discuss. G. Is your size/wt and bought medium but she cannot stand any constriction. She looks floaty, not swamped.
Murphy: She also has an ultra-minimalist apartment! It’a a philosophy.But more shoes..
Jane in London said…

What a heady concept, to start one's wardrobe again from scratch. I like all those choices, though I rarely buy 100% linen pieces because I just can't cope with the creases...

That absurd evening dress seems like a total throw-back to the bad old days - corsets!! Bad for body and soul, imo.

All my everyday trousers have back pockets, because I need to slip my phone in there. But it wasn't a consideration for me in the pre-mobile phone era. I don't wear skirts, so that's not an issue.

I love those traditional Cornish sailcloth smocks, with a huge deep pocket at the front. Essential kit for artists, gardeners and anyone who needs a useful cover-up that doesn't scream "overall".
Allison said…
How interesting to read about Anna Jeness Miller and her work to liberate women from corsets, muck tracking skirts etc. compare to today with Ms. K at the Met Gala who self admitted that breathing was a challenge as well we are back to the ‘puddle pants’ dragging in the muck…difference is unlike Ms Miller and thanks to her and others we have a choice. Ms K didn’t HAVE to wear that gown and others can choose the pants that work for them in the season of life they are currently at.
I say yes to wider legged pants because they are cool but no to dragging hems because..filthy and trippin’ hazard. Been there done that and have the incision on my knee as a souvenir. I am at the stage where ‘au courant’ is in the want column not a need.
I would love to toss and start from scratch but realize that is not practical nor in the budget. I am loving your friend’s purchases though and really appreciate ( as I am vertically challenged) ‘floaty not swamped’!!
Duchesse said…
Jay: Some wear looks mellow and elegant, other wear looks sad; I am confident you know which, when you survey your pieces.

Murphy: I know! You should see her apartment. She bought six placemats and gave me two (she had already given me four of them as a gift) because six was "too many"!'

Jane in London: I cannot put my phone in my back pocket because I damage the screen ;)

Allison: We can forget what a fight it was for women to get rid of those restrictive garments. Women a generation younger than me are sometimes unaware that women had to fight to own property in their own names, have a chequing account or get a loan without a husband as co-signer.
I never liked dragging hems, unsafe, impossible to keep clean and prone to shredding and frays.

Duchesse said…
avicennia has left a new comment on your post "Getting and Spending: Gisele's summer splurge":

Laughing at myself. Ordering clothing online from store in another country doesn’t seem unusual now, but somehow an international call to the store did not occur to me! I mistyped my height, I’m 5’5, but that said floaty is what I like as well. So an M it is!

Now on another note, given the focus on pearls at the Passage, I’ll share that my favorite Tahitian gray pearl on a chain (gumball size), was stolen earlier this month from my room at a B&B. I’m kicking myself about it, I’ve stayed there many times over 25 years, I’ve never before traveled with jewelry to developing countries. This was my first time with anymore more that pearl stud earrings. I would have gladly given the equivalent value, but the necklace had sentimental value — a friend sourced it for me during a particularly difficult period of my life. I’m mustering the energy to look for a new pearl.
Duchesse said…
avicennia: I don't know what happened here; your comment (above) came into my inbox but not to the blog, so I copied it here.
I am heartsick you lost your sentimental Tahitian pearl. I do not know where you live but suggest you look at the pearl/chain pieces at Kamoka Pearl. The quality is exceptional and these are seriously ecologically-responsible pearl farmers. If you do not see what you want, ask them what else they have that is not on the site.

https://kamokapearls.com/collections/strands/products/peacock-green-10mm-tahitian-pearl-solitaire-necklace

The posts with the most