Uneven Aging: Traditional gatherings

Liz is an avid canoeist of Ontario's lakes; Stephen is a retired banker. The two could not be more different temperamentally, but share one characteristic: each has a health condition that has recently upended a beloved tradition.

For over fifty years, Liz and ten women who met in childhood at summer camp have gathered for a four-day canoe trip in Ontario's Algonquin Park. The group have endured health crises, family tumult (aka adolescence) and one ran off to New Mexico with a lover twenty years younger—but was back the next summer. Now, arthritis has severely impaired Liz' ability to paddle and portage. She decided, after last summer's exhausting trip, that it was time to bow out—and got the surprise of her life.

Arowhon Pines Inn, Algonquin Park, Ontario

Six of the trippers thanked her for her honesty, and suggested they try a walking and birding tour of the park on trails made from former railbeds, and swap their tents for a renowned inn. Three others tried to convince her that she could still handle the canoe trip, practicing a form of denial-by-proxy. (One said she did not care either way and would go with the majority.) The canoeists suggested hiring a porter for Liz, but she said she would rather adjust by way of "Plan B—for Bird."

The walkers had a delightful time. Liz noticed that, free from throbbing pain, she had deeper, more satisfying conversations. The four canoeists joined them on the last day for dinner at the inn and said it was mighty nice to have a gourmet meal served—and no biting bugs. One suggested, "Why don't we keep to our same time, next year schedule, but each will choose the inn or the tent?"

"We are all aging, but differently", Liz says, "and unless we admit that, we will lose friendships of a half-century,"

Stephen and his wife, Martha, are an American couple who have spent summers in Montréal for nearly two decades to escape the heat of their southern US city. Except for the two pandemic summers, they have returned each June to their favourite paths, parks and cafés. When I spent an evening with Martha in late summer, she mentioned that Stephen had been having symptoms of heart disease, but he insisted that he would wait to see his doctor until they were home in early November. 

When she told me his resting heart rate and said it had been that high for at least a week, I, a former runner, was stunned. I encouraged her to get him to a doctor here—or at very least call TeleHealth—immediately. She said, "He will not listen to me." One of the reasons Stephen resisted is that he knows how much Martha's Montréal summers mean to her. The city is more than an escape from torrid temperatures, its joie de vivre feeds her spirit. He did not want to compromise her experience.

Less than a week later, Stephen had urgent surgery at a Montréal hospital for a pacemaker—maybe not a close call, but certainly a wake-up one. His emergency underscored the need for more expedient intervention, and less procrastination. (He was entirely pleased with his care and made a full recovery.)

Liz and Stephen represent two different strategies. Hers was to alter the tradition, retaining parts but adapting to her limitations. His was riskier: hang in until someone or something changed the custom. 

Nor should we take risks with the heart metaphorically. Besides the actual health issue, the afflicted person also copes with guilt, frustration, and longing. They don’t want to alter a revered custom, so their reluctance can lead to unwise, even dangerous decisions. 

The healthier partner or friend might first anticipate that change will inevitably alter a longstanding tradition, and that the afflicted person—the very one who needs accommodation—may resist it most, downplaying fatigue, stress or pain in order to present a same-as-ever front. Liz said that because her Buddhist practice includes the recognition of impermanence, her faith helped her adjust to the "Plan B" Algonquin trip. 

Next, the healthier partner or friend needs to talk. The person struggling to keep participating will need reassurance that you are not suggesting that she simply drop out. 

If you have some ideas, offer them as possibilities. "How would you feel about us staying at an inn instead of camping?" sets a different tone than, "Last summer, I noticed you had to rest every couple of hours."  That may be accurate, but pointing out a deficiency takes the conversation into denial and defensiveness. 

Traditional gatherings take root because they are valued; the formative idea is, "Oh, that was wonderful; let's keep doing it!" With uneven aging, the question becomes, Can we alter this to retain what we most enjoy?  I'm not going to sugarcoat it; sometimes the gathering is too high-risk and the person does have to stop attending. Sit with them and mourn the loss of the live-aboard dive trip or the run that's now definitely perilous, and see if you can make a new tradition; they have to start somewhere.

Ideally, the matter is tackled a well before the date, but not always. Sometimes, only when the extra dishes are hauled out and supplies carted into the house does the person by your side confess to dreading the event—or you both are apprehensive, but haven't raised the matter. 


Soup party; Photo: AllRecipes.com

Alterations can be made even late in the game. Marie, expecting fifteen for Thanksgiving dinner, and suddenly without her husband's intensive culinary support, decided to furlough the big-deal turkey dinner and threw a soup party instead. She made three delicious soups in advance, bought an assortment of breads, and left the dessert-making to her adult children and older grands.

Every person who is aging thinks about time remaining: how much longer to hear a loon call from a misted lake? How much longer to cook dinner with old school friends at the annual weekend? Not long, we know, so it is natural to cling to these deeply-felt customs, and also important to recognize the deeper gifts of traditional gatherings or practices, whether private or cultural.

One of the useful reflective exercises I learned in time spent with the late anthropologist and author Angeles Arrien was to make and share a list of our traditional gatherings, and for each, to name the qualities these added to our lives and that of those who joined us. Time and again, we said to one another, here is where we find connection, gratitude, wonder, a reunion with nature and our role as stewards.  

Only when we acknowledge the changes life brings can we find new ways to celebrate,  and continue to be engaged in the long-standing gatherings we value, despite our limitations.

(Names have been changed to respect the privacy of these persons.)





 

Comments

Jane in London said…
Oh, I do so love the pieces you have written in this series. Each one has prompted me to think carefully and deeply - thank you. This one is very relevant to me as I re-think some of the longstanding traditions in my own life. It can be so hard to break the chain after many years, but in the end one must try to remember those times with gratitude for having had them, rather than with regret for no longer being able to continue them. Easy enough to say, of course. To every thing there is a season, etc...
Kamchick said…
This post resonates with me also. At 83, I have experienced loss of relatives and friends. Recently I attended my 60th university reunion Homecoming and noticed that the group marching behind the '63 flag was quite small (enthusiastic, though!). I am a member of a wonderful walking group in our rural location. There have been some adjustments...some of us still are able to hike for many kilometres, some are fast, some have slowed down, some have joint or other ' problems'. We allow for these changes that are inevitable but treasure the value of the group that has been together for 20 years. Health problems tend to be more significant and now we depend on city specialized medicine which we have to commute for. Or, as in our own case, we intentionally move to 'senior' living in the city so that we have closer support of family and health care. It seems to be all about adapting to change in the best way one can, while keeping those strong social connections that have developed over the years.
Beth said…
We have many "active" friends who are all dealing with this issue. We were pleased, on a recent trip after several years of being grounded due to the pandemic, to discover that our stamina and strength were still pretty good, and compatible with each other, but we realize this won't last forever, and try to make our plans accordingly, and gracefully. I know of couples where one partner pushes the other beyond their physical and emotional limits, and we don't want to be like this, ever. As in so many other areas of relationship-life, the key is clear and open communication. On this particular trip, there was one hike that I was worried would be too much for my knees, but we discussed it beforehand and made a plan; I did go in the end and am incredibly glad that I did.
Allison said…
Since we have the space to host birthdays and holiday celebrations I am more than happy to do so…my DIL who is very grateful that I take this on ( two grandchildren birthdays and Halloween all within three days!) asked if it wasn’t getting to be too much as I will be hosting again over the holidays ( #1&#2 sons birthdays plus Christmas all within three days…is there a theme here?) I told her not to worry as the time will come when she will have the bigger house or I might not feel up to to hosting. Meanwhile we enjoy having the babies around us and making memories with them knowing the time will come to pass the baton. My grandmother and mother gave over to the younger generation as they got older and developed health issues or just were no longer able to do it. My parents always knew they had a place at one of our tables .My aunt & uncle went from large family celebrations to eating in a hotel…my brother put a stop to that when my aunt tearfully admitted to missing Christmas with ‘everybody’He graciously made room for them and they happily celebrated those last few holidays with ‘everybody’ around them. (Their one son lived out of province and daughter was single and travelled over the Christmas holiday) I guess the lesson here is to plan those changes and discuss with family how you’d like to implement them beforehand. …and yes my brother on more than one occasion admitted to having a ‘National Lampoon Christmas’.
Duchesse said…
Jane in London: These posts are important to me, too, as I have learned from friends—those mentioned and others. They sort into two groups: those who alter traditions and those who insist on maintaining the full (and increasingly difficult) version. I am in the former camp, because if everyone else is having a good time but the afflicted person and his or her partner are absolutely wrung out, what is the point?

Kamchick: Thanks for pointing out that traditions are part of a bigger picture of more conscious support and connection. For a time, many of our friend circle were moving to the country, drawn by the natural beauty and restorative effect. Now, well over half have sold their country places, and re-settled closer to cities or towns for ready access to health care and to reduce commuting time for family visits. One kept her cabin but rents it most of the year and got an apt. in a nearby town.

Allison: Your comments reflect the openness and practicality I'm plumping for. You would be surprised how many of my friends have been 'voluntold', as in, "It's OK for us to have Teddy's party at your place again, right? (...because I already invited the guests.) This year Teddy has invited four of his friends to come along for the weekend. They just love sleepovers!"

Beth: When one person pushes another beyond limits, it can be many things: simple enthusiasm; a wish to get the most out of an expensive trip; or a lack of caring about their partner's differences in energy level, fitness or even interest in the activity. They say if you want to test a relationship, take a fairly long trip with someone. You seem to be mutually sensitive and considerate.
Tom said…
Did your American friend use the Canadian healthcare system (and, if so, did he buy insurance to cover that) or did he go back to the US? I would love to hear the details on this. eva
Duchesse said…
Eva: His symptoms arose when he was here; he was admitted via urgent care. (The other option was for him to fly to TX, risky. He's over age 80.) US plans like Medicare are not accepted in Canada.

He has travel health insurance. Anyone travelling outside the US should have travel insurance (which must be bought before the departure date) such as Blue Cross unless they have nice plump travel coverage through their private plan. And check the private plan's fine print. Kaiser would not cover another friend who lives here part of the year because she was "residing"— not travelling. She owns a condo in Montréal.

He was taken to CHUM (Centre d'hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal.) His wife worried that he would not be treated in English. (To put it simply: only some hospitals in this city are designated to deliver all services in English as well as French, others are not, and offer only some services in English, or provide them "when resources allow." CHUM is not designated as an English/French site, but that does not mean care won't be given in English, if it is possible. CHUM is listed (in a Forbes article) as one of the 100 best hospitals in the world.

He was treated in English, and said only positive things about his care. For years he has questioned me about our health care system. Now he has seen it firsthand and I am happy to say, we passed muster in this case.

royleen said…
I so appreciate your thoughtful writing. This issue has been a challenge for some of my friends. Your beautiful post has give me many good ideas

The posts with the most