Second début: Francine Pelletier on feminism's foundering freedoms
Photo: Le Devoir |
"Second Début, Cendres et Renaissance du Feminisme" examines two feminine archtypes that have assumed centre stage in these times: the super-sexy and the ultra-covered.
She notes, "Fashion and porn bring to life the idea that a woman is first a sexual animal. The hypersexualized images are a way of reminding women to fall in line, as are the burka and chador."
We live with a new Iron Curtain, she suggests, "one side in lingerie and the other covered head to toe." To be reduced to a body, Pelletier says, is way of telling women, "Stay girls, even if you want to act like men."
A woman may assert that she is "affirming her sexuality" and "in control of her body", and claim "I'm liberated and empowered and can do what I want". But Pelletier warns that ready participation in a permissive, "cool", soft-porn culture that tells women they have achieved something by overtly sexy display of their bodies is a con job.
She questions the energy spent fighting for women's freedom to go shirtless or to appear in little but our filmiest underwear. (She does acknowledge the sensual pleasure of displaying one's charms.)
Such matters divert attention from the gender equality, reproductive rights, and violence against women, among other pressing concerns. (There is a belief that we've beaten the gender equality issue; in Canada and the US, the results are an unimpressive 19% gap.)
She links the fundamentalist beliefs that fueled the Charlie Hebdo massacres to another slaughter, that of fourteen women at Montréal's École Polytechnic twenty-five years ago; both massacres, she notes, were aimed at obliterating a specific group who were represented change, and who spoke openly. (Pelletier lobbied for public release of the killer's suicide note, which included names of women he wished to target; her name was included.)
She says women's confidence has been shaken, leading to women, such as those allegedly attacked by Jian Ghomeshi, who are terrified to speak out.
And finally, she reveals her own contradictions, fears and humanity. Recounting her assault within an initially consenting relationship, an incident that she did not report, Francine Pelletier refers to her own "Inner Jello" and calls on every woman to end silent collusion with violence.
(Seconde début is currently available in a French edition.)
Comments
Are young women today as upset by this discrepancy as I am? I wish I saw more real indignation, action, and outspokenness around this (and other gender-related) problems.
big hug,
Janice
The earnings issue is very troublesome, but I still hold out hope that, as more women than men go to college, earnings equality if near.
Younger women need to be aware early on that they will likely earn less than their male counterparts and that it is not okay.
They can not rely on marriage to "fill the gap." As a society, we need to ask "why" the wage inequality exists and whether we consciously or unconsciously place more value on the work of men.
Personally, I'm very uncomfortable with this sexualized culture, and the way the younger women just seem to take it for granted... though perhaps they don't, and that's just a mistaken impression also caused by the media, I don't know.
Lin
Pelletier's point is that, on both sides, the woman has been reduced to her body, a 'thing' to be obscured or served up.
frugal: Please, keep making them!
Anonymnity is its own kind of veil, and I will shortly be posting on why, in September when the blog returns from summer break, I will disable the ability to comment anonymously. I have a wish that we all stand up for what we write, even if that means getting a Google or other account. In the meantime, I have from time to time asked anonymous commenters to sign a name or pseudonym and am grateful when they do that.