Mary Quant at the V&A: A Return to Swinging London

Mary Quant models ca 1968

In London last month, I visited the V&AT to see the Mary Quant exhibition, timed to celebrate her latest honour, a Lifetime Achievement Award from the first annual World Fashion Awards, which recognized her vivid imprint on an era when women's fashion turned around, almost overnight.

I coveted Quant’s clothes when I was in my twenties, and wore some of the knockoffs carried by American department stores.

I saw what I remembered: pungent reds and oranges, graphic prints (including her trademark daisy), tromp l'oeil neckties and collars, grommets and exposed zippers. Her name is synonymous with the miniskirt of Swinging London; after seeing the photos of those in Vogue, we picked up our scissors: short! shorter! Schools issued length edicts.

The set below is utterly Mary Quant: left, a floral mini, upper right, her signature wool jersey dress with attached tie and rear view of a jumpsuit; lower right, a vinyl coat, groundbreaking at the time.
Simple designs, bright colours: those of us who with even basic sewing skills could make some of these styles.


But surprise! This is Mary Quant, too:
From left to right: a restrained grey wool suit with knee-length skirt; a lemon yellow matelassé tunic and trousers; a fake-fur cheetah coat, and a ravishing evening grown with art deco motifs and appliquéed New York City skyscrapers (the gown is called "Manhattan").


Mary Quant hit the target pinned on the '60s, squarely in the centre of its kohl-lined bulls' eye. She was the epitome of freedom and fun, but the clothing did not compete with the wearer. When the V&A put out a call for clothing they might use in the show, they received over 800 submissions. Not many designers' pieces have been preserved with such ardour.

Those of us who sewed our Mary-ish little dresses learned to buy the right fabric. I left the museum wondering where, today, a woman can find those substantial cotton jersey and wool knits, heavy by today’s standards. Eileen Fisher offer some, but absent Quant’s insouciance and riotous relationship to colour.

You can still see her influence today, in a handful of brands that offer a glimpse of that joy and wit:


Left to right:
Victoria jacquard dress, which was in the window at Boden's Sloane Square shop, channels Quant and also her contemporary, textile designer Celia Birtwell.
White Stuff navy gridlock star jumper John Lewis.
Elsie pleated red dress; Temperley London.

I have seen a number of fashion exhibitions in the last five years; some are theatrically wild (Montana, Gaultier), some supremely elegant (James, Dior), others magnificent tours de force (St. Laurent, Balenciaga, Margiela) but none as happy as that of Mary Quant.

As I passed through Knightsbridge, the austere clothes in many boutique windows looked look like the party has passed them by—as if fashion had flown toward a more sombre world, from dolly bird to blackbird.




Comments

Mary said…
Thanks for your review of Mary Quant's V&A exhibition. Count me in as one who also loved to sew in her style back. I'll be in London in January and already planned to attend. Your description assures me that it will be time well spent.
LauraH said…
Oh I would love to have seen that exhibition! Thanks for sharing, it brings back such wonderful...and colourful...memories. The colours and patterns I saw as a girl, even glimpses, shaped and reinforced my love of colour. And then the psychedelic sixties! Of course, I completely agree with your last paragraph.
materfamilias said…
Delicious! I would have loved this exhibition. . . and immediately think of dresses, prints, fabirc colours, and the thrill of looking through the pattern catalogues at Eaton's to find a Butterick or McCall's or Vogue or Simplicity iteration my scissors and sewing machine could manage (or that I could convince my mom to stitch up for me. . . .
Duchesse said…
Mary and ma: We would buy the fabric and run up a miniskirt all in the same afternoon, to wear out that evening. I did learn my lesson trying to make those a-line dresses out of too- thin cotton. Viewed close up, I could see how substantial her cotton jerseys were.

No wonder they were pricey, the quality is evident. Have a wonderful visit, Mary!

LauraH: I was interested to see that though Quant used vibrant colour in bold styles, she did not choose psychedelic prints. She was a mod.
That Manhattan evening gown was right out of the ‘ 30s, really opened my eyes to her range...and despite a simple silhouette, attention to tailoring.


royleen said…
Be still, my heart! I loved those clothes! Wish I still had some of them. Mine were knock-offs, or ones I made myself, and they fit the mood of the times, and so easy to wear.
Loved your review! As another Mary Quant fan, I adored her happy, hopeful clothes.

Should anyone want to try and recreate their Mary Quant sewing experience, the V&A is offering a free downloadable sewing pattern for the “Georgie Dress”: https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/sew-your-own-mary-quant-georgie-dress

Now If only I could find some Yardley cosmetics! ��
Mary said…
Ha, Duchesse, your comment about the quality of Quant's fabrics/work reminds me of a jersey A-line mini-dress I bought, rather than made, in 1968. It's styling paid homage to Quant, but its execution did not. My first wearing was with a date to see Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet. Unfortunately, I discovered upon leaving the theatre-- while crying my eyes out--that the side seams of the dress were unraveling with every step I took. Had to press my arms tightly to my sides trying to hold the dress together while I periodically lifted one arm at the elbow to wipe my streaming eyes. At that point, I wasn't just crying about the movie. :)
Yes, the Manhattan dress is definitely Deco, with the Orientalist inflences also common at the time. That could be Berlin as much as Manhattan, though the skyscrapers were more US at the time. And the dress on the left references Russian constructivism and other avant-garde styling from a century ago.

Sounds like a splendid show!
Jill said…
I still have a few of my Butterick Mary Quant sewing patterns. The 60s were great years for fun fashion. You are so right about that. Fun is the key word! Butterick featured many young designers back then. Such innovative and fresh design. What has happened to that freewheeling spirit? I wonder.
Duchesse said…
Jill: The V&A offer a free online pattern for a minidress: https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/sew-your-own-mary-quant-style-minidress

The original Mary Quant patterns: some are for sale on Etsy and vintage-style sewer's sites- usually around $30 each for those in very good condition.

Quite a few young women at the exhibition wore miniskirts and one remarked to me that she thought the clothes of the '60s were far more fun to wear than today's tight and often synthetic goods.
Bunny said…
These garments were so easy to sew, too. They were simple shifts, A lines, maybe a peter pan collar. I sewed my share, too! We could not get them short enough and they were cute, cute, cute. They never struck me as glamorous but oh, so wearable and cute. Our inner Twiggies couldn't wear these styles enough.
Duchesse said…
Beverely in Canada: Remember Menley & James "Love"? Oh and Aqua Manda, I was crazy about it. Fun to remember the cosmetics as well as the clothes. Now where did I put my white lipstick?

Bunny: Is it me or did young women sew more then? I even made those Mary a-line little dresses out of felt! For a bit of glamour we had those Afghan hippie coats with the embroidery, but when wet they smelled like a barnyard.

The posts with the most