Strict style: Update and sources
Laurie commented, "My favorite post of yours was on the French strict style of dressing. For the last few years I have been working to develop that style for my closet without consciously knowing that it is a style, and where to source it. ...I'd love to see you do an updated post on the subject."
My first thought was, what else is there to say? But Laurie's request intrigued me.
Strict is the term I coined a year ago for a spare, refined subset of the minimalist/classic school, characterized by subtlety, quality and perfect fit. To illustrate, I'm using photos from The Sartorialist.
It is neither eccentric nor androgenous, like this.
And certainly not va-voom, like this. Strict does not apply colour with a broad brush, then tart it up with with a busy necklace.
Nor would strict wear leggings and an oversized sweater like GF glimpsed at the right of the shot.
A women in strict is not without figure; she is simply not centering her presentation on it.
Nor is it tailored, elegant 'jolie madame' clothing, which is more conservative in its classicism.
Then what is it?
Semi-strict, or 'soft-strict'
Not quite strict, but the quality is there, along with the attitude of controlled and conscious harmony.
As I scrolled though The Sartorialist's shots, I thought "Am I ever going to find my example?" I realized this style does not draw the eye in an obvious way. The woman is not dressing to stop traffic or get her photo taken.
Voila!
Then I thought, ah, finally.
The hallmarks of strict are here: The mixed texture in one garment (transparent and opaque), restrained use of colour (note the little string bracelets), the fine quality, the interesting yet offhand jewelry (pendant peeking from beneath blouse), the femininity that does not trade on overt sexiness, the undone-looking (but beautifully cut) hair, the minimal makeup. Commenters praised her 'simplicity', 'elegance' and 'effortlessness'.
They called her 'adorable but chic' and 'understated but classy' and 'natural but glamourous'. That opposition is the whole point. One commenter said, "the woman's outfit is unremarkable". That person does not have the eye to appreciate strict.
There is glamour to strict, otherwise it is dull, and lands in the classic-safe Eileen Fisher category.
You have to avoid the generic to achieve this look; her blouse is not from Banana Republic.
You can dress casually in strict, like this NYC cyclist.
There may be pattern, but it is not multicoloured, bright or figural. There is a softness but at the same time, a spareness and discipline.
So the café reader is in strict, and the woman in the dress, not.
Strict, Milanese school
Scott Schuman said, "The best of Milan. On a street blinged out on Cavalli and Dolce this super subtle look carried more strength and dignity than any other."
Often the colour is in the accessory– scarf, belt or bag. Strict is not a deliberately austere intellectual look, either; that sort of woman might wear fine leather oxfords with this sweater and skirt.
Examples, designers, sources
European garments are not necessarily strict; there's a boatload of flou frockery in Paris. But most strict clothes are European. This Philosophy di Alberta Ferretti black jersey dress looks simple till you notice the precise seaming and piped neckline. $465 from Net-a-porter, a good international source for strict pieces– but you still have to search.
Aquascutum Yvette fine wool top, ($625 from Net-a-porter) is strict, all right, and delivers another prinicple: less is more.
J. Crew's blackberry duffle coat is a deep, character-laden colour that strict loves. $298.
J. Crew are good for edging into this style although the strict signature of subtle luxury might be a bit diluted.
Bruno Cucinelli cashmere vest, a piece of versatility and longevity, allows me to show that the clothes don't need to be dark. ($1,445 from Saks Fifth Avenue).
100% cashmere fitted kimono coat in a luminous grey; Eric Bompard, €740.
Snug strict: Sheepskin gilet from Brora, £269, worn with gray flannel wide-legged pants, not jeans.
Party strict: Diane von Furstenberg Belia lace wool wrap dress, $385 from Net-a-porter.
Vanessa Bruno chocolate wool jersey pleat-front dress, $430, also Net-a-porter.
Aminaka Wilmont wool and leather jacket with peak detailing at elbows, welt pockets and zip fastening at front. $1,270 at Net-a-porter. Sophisticated, but neither conservative nor eccentric.
Not for everyone
I originally identified strict when looking for the 'magic ingredient' that differentiated some European dressers from North Americans. I was looking for a way of dressing you usually don't see here. We show more avidity for colour and embellishment.
There's nothing 'right' about strict or 'wrong' about colour and pattern; there are many options for adornment. These British girlfriends in their riotous, jumbled patterns appeal to me too.
Writing this post has, however, reconfirmed my fondness for subdued style, perhaps an effect of autumn's approach. Must be the season of the strict.
My first thought was, what else is there to say? But Laurie's request intrigued me.
Strict is the term I coined a year ago for a spare, refined subset of the minimalist/classic school, characterized by subtlety, quality and perfect fit. To illustrate, I'm using photos from The Sartorialist.
It is neither eccentric nor androgenous, like this.
And certainly not va-voom, like this. Strict does not apply colour with a broad brush, then tart it up with with a busy necklace.
Nor would strict wear leggings and an oversized sweater like GF glimpsed at the right of the shot.
A women in strict is not without figure; she is simply not centering her presentation on it.
Nor is it tailored, elegant 'jolie madame' clothing, which is more conservative in its classicism.
Then what is it?
Semi-strict, or 'soft-strict'
Not quite strict, but the quality is there, along with the attitude of controlled and conscious harmony.
As I scrolled though The Sartorialist's shots, I thought "Am I ever going to find my example?" I realized this style does not draw the eye in an obvious way. The woman is not dressing to stop traffic or get her photo taken.
Voila!
Then I thought, ah, finally.
The hallmarks of strict are here: The mixed texture in one garment (transparent and opaque), restrained use of colour (note the little string bracelets), the fine quality, the interesting yet offhand jewelry (pendant peeking from beneath blouse), the femininity that does not trade on overt sexiness, the undone-looking (but beautifully cut) hair, the minimal makeup. Commenters praised her 'simplicity', 'elegance' and 'effortlessness'.
They called her 'adorable but chic' and 'understated but classy' and 'natural but glamourous'. That opposition is the whole point. One commenter said, "the woman's outfit is unremarkable". That person does not have the eye to appreciate strict.
There is glamour to strict, otherwise it is dull, and lands in the classic-safe Eileen Fisher category.
You have to avoid the generic to achieve this look; her blouse is not from Banana Republic.
You can dress casually in strict, like this NYC cyclist.
There may be pattern, but it is not multicoloured, bright or figural. There is a softness but at the same time, a spareness and discipline.
So the café reader is in strict, and the woman in the dress, not.
Strict, Milanese school
Scott Schuman said, "The best of Milan. On a street blinged out on Cavalli and Dolce this super subtle look carried more strength and dignity than any other."
Often the colour is in the accessory– scarf, belt or bag. Strict is not a deliberately austere intellectual look, either; that sort of woman might wear fine leather oxfords with this sweater and skirt.
Examples, designers, sources
European garments are not necessarily strict; there's a boatload of flou frockery in Paris. But most strict clothes are European. This Philosophy di Alberta Ferretti black jersey dress looks simple till you notice the precise seaming and piped neckline. $465 from Net-a-porter, a good international source for strict pieces– but you still have to search.
Aquascutum Yvette fine wool top, ($625 from Net-a-porter) is strict, all right, and delivers another prinicple: less is more.
J. Crew's blackberry duffle coat is a deep, character-laden colour that strict loves. $298.
J. Crew are good for edging into this style although the strict signature of subtle luxury might be a bit diluted.
Bruno Cucinelli cashmere vest, a piece of versatility and longevity, allows me to show that the clothes don't need to be dark. ($1,445 from Saks Fifth Avenue).
100% cashmere fitted kimono coat in a luminous grey; Eric Bompard, €740.
Snug strict: Sheepskin gilet from Brora, £269, worn with gray flannel wide-legged pants, not jeans.
Party strict: Diane von Furstenberg Belia lace wool wrap dress, $385 from Net-a-porter.
Vanessa Bruno chocolate wool jersey pleat-front dress, $430, also Net-a-porter.
Aminaka Wilmont wool and leather jacket with peak detailing at elbows, welt pockets and zip fastening at front. $1,270 at Net-a-porter. Sophisticated, but neither conservative nor eccentric.
Not for everyone
I originally identified strict when looking for the 'magic ingredient' that differentiated some European dressers from North Americans. I was looking for a way of dressing you usually don't see here. We show more avidity for colour and embellishment.
There's nothing 'right' about strict or 'wrong' about colour and pattern; there are many options for adornment. These British girlfriends in their riotous, jumbled patterns appeal to me too.
Writing this post has, however, reconfirmed my fondness for subdued style, perhaps an effect of autumn's approach. Must be the season of the strict.
Comments
IMO strict style requires a perfect figure to pull off, so it's not for me.
I would though like to dress like the older woman in black, with the cane, in another 20 years.
It is certainly not a style that works for everyone, and not all European women dress this way by any means, but there are elements of paring down that are great lessons here, whether one is bourgeoise or boho.
Belle de Ville, I don't think it is so much a matter of a "perfect figure" (which is always socially defined anyway, and not identical in different cultures) but of a relatively straight up-and-down one. One needn't be razor-slim to dress this way - I have seen it on sturdy Northern European women - indeed Jil Sander and co. but it does not work on curvy women with a big bust-waist-hips differential. I'd rather show a bit of décolleté, for one thing.
I do like the simplicity and the deep, subtle colours, but do like a bit more fantasy too.
Hmm, I'd think a cyclist who opts for "strict" would be more of the "cycle-chic" clan, not a wearer of shorts en ville, non?
You have made my entire week with this post and have given me much to think about while shopping in San Francisco later on this month. This style of dressing works fairly well for me because it works with my quirky hair. My hair always tends to be my standout accessory when I use a subdued palette for clothing with soft lines and minimal, personal jewelry. I am also short, straight up and down but chunky so it suits my body style.
Your posts on "strict style" have helped me refine my personal style in a way that the oodles of style books on the market have not. Now I know much better what I am looking for.
Thank you for saving me some time, lots of $$ from purchasing mistakes and the queasy feeling of not having a "personal style."
Sander and Lang good sources.
lagatta: I've seen a *hint* of décollté in strict, as in deep v-neck sweater or transparent insert- but not deep décollté. Not the best style to make the most of an hourglass but available to the strongly built woman.
Photo of cyclist is in full, hot summer, shorts an option at her age.
materfamilias: They might also be committed to small wardrobes. The clothes are expensive and with a limited palette they do not need too many things.
LPC: I like the 'kinder, gentler' e girl in the big scarf and checked pants. Except my days of checked pants are over!
Style Spy: Big honkin' jewlery would not be even even "semi", but it sure is fun!
Still, being in somewhat of a lost confusion of wardrobe reaccomodation, your posts help remind me of my priorities and refine my choices. Thank you.
My summer style is definitely strict, but during the winter I find myself veering towards color. Either way, I’m always drawn to “neutral pieces with an edge,” whether in the form of cross-dyed linen, exposed seams, micro-pleats, or a particularly elegant shade of white. I own three pairs of identical, perfectly-fitting deep charcoal trousers. To my mind Bottega Veneta designs some wonderfully innovative “strict” pieces (not that I’m fortunate enough to own any).
I think that “strict style” also provides an antidote if one feels “too old for irony.” I agree that strict style is not cerebral for the sake of being so, it is more like a “sartorial challenge” that takes some intelligence and observation for the viewer to process.
I would love to “go strict” all year around…and I think that finding the right pieces could even compensate for the lack of color during the winter. The problem is the homogeneity and poor quality of affordable clothing, which makes it difficult to “find the right pieces.” I’d be interested to learn of the impact that globalization (e.g., stores like The Gap and Banana Republic) has had on European retail.
Mardel: Certainly not for everyone! But it is not unremittingly somber, either. Such a subtle style, sometimes challenged to describe it.
Jane: Wednesdays, too.
How I envy your three pairs of perfect charcoal trousers, I am still searching for one. Bottega does some strict, but also decidedly sexy pieces. Dries Van Noten seems the magic intersection of strict tailoring and tantalizing colour, sort of 'strict on a bender'.
By frizzy I mean very tightly curled as in African or even some Mediterranean peoples, not frizzy as in hair that is in bad shape.
I will NOT chemically-straighten or hot-comb my hair. It wrecks it.
By the way, duchesse, I keep laughing about my inner Mediterranean babe. No, I certainly don't dress like Cristina Kirchner (President of Argentina), not to mention the Berlusconian bimbas. But there is a part of me that insists on expressing adult sexuality, à la Anna Magnani. I love her.
characteristics about the strict from this post which made me take notice. Softness incorporated with
tranparency, color added through bags and shoes and the price point
I'd most often be looking for can be found at J Crew. Please continue pointing out examples of strict(I do wish it had a different name). It has a following.
lagatta: Annna Magnani- superb example of a sensuous woman. Italian- though her father was thought to be Egyptian.
Jeannie: The term came from a comment the owner of the sublime textiles boutique Wolff and Decourtis, Victoria Wolff, made to me. She referred to a colourway in one of their pieces as "plus strict". The closest English translation would be "more restrained";
And J. Crew is a much more accessible price point for me, too!
I will write more on strict from time to time.
When I shop in Paris it's for accessories and sweaters, which some French brands make ample enough for me. I asked my French GF "Where do women my size shop"? She replied, "Germany."
Thank you for sharing the remarks from your French GF's about shopping in Germany. I've always wondered about that myself and their response gave me a good chuckle.
I found the most AMAZING strict Agnona cashmere jacket at the Goodwill! It hadn't been worn and is the most gorgeous strict thing I have ever seen. I wear it and feel wrapped up in luxury.
Some days I feel strict indeed.