Sari Botton's epiphany at Eileen Fisher
Sari Botton, writer and editor of the illuminating Substack magazine Oldster, wrote a heartfelt post, "What Does It Mean to Dress Your Age?", available with the read-for-free option. In short, she visits an Eileen Fisher outlet store with a couple of male friends who deliver "Queer Eye for the Nearly-Age-60 Friend".
What is of more interest than the clothes (this is still EF) is her attitude: long a "Wear Whatever the F I Want" woman, she now grapples with whether it's "finally time to dress like an adult"—which she defines as "Like, it's my duty to adopt a more formal look—smart skirt suits, crisp blouses, gabardine slacks, tea-length dresses—but also loose, shapeless linen outfits in muted tones that don't call attention to the ever-increasing softness of my body and the changes in my shape."
Notice certain adjectives: formal, loose, shapeless, muted. I've been an adult far longer, and never signed up for that fate.
What about word duty? When it concerns personal presentation, I see "duty" not solely as the dictionary definition ("a responsibility") but as a form of respect, whether for the site itself, e.g., the Royal Albert Hall; a fine-dining restaurant; a place of worship. What we choose to wear in public supports or rejects the intended tone of those settings.
I also respect my hosts, and dress, not "formally", but more consciously when their guest. Sometimes, I respect the preferences of Le Duc, who has given up ever seeing me in heels again but does hope for a fitted top.
Finally, I respect myself, choosing to look like a going concern even if only walking to the market, an elder who participates in public life. That does not, however, lead me to a skirt suit, unless I receive a summons to appear in court. But I would very much like to wear Boden's aubergine cord trouser suit, any day:
![]() |
Photo: Boden UK |
Having witnessed grungy, oppositional adolescences under my very roof, I view "I'll wear whatever the f I want"" as teenaged testing of norms. I still think of that era as It Wouldn't Kill You to Wear a Clean Shirt. Defiance at age 16 is part of the package; by 60 it suggests moth-eaten self-regard.
Botton's big-decade birthday is a reckoning about all aspects of life. My friend Giselle said hers came when at age 70 she traded the backpack she had taken to Brittany for four decades for a roller bag. For my 60th, I shed twee floral prints and a clump of corporate blazers.
Wearing clothes or accessories designed for persons born two generations after yours will not make 90% of women who try it look younger. (There is Carine Roitfeld, granted.) I'm not going to describe those pieces here, just walk through a mall. Sari Botton is lucky to have friends who shared their expertise and enthusiasm; a few more outings with these two and she'll shed that dated image of sexagenarian somnolesence.
No parting shot at EF, an accessible source of relaxed, discreet clothing. In EF, a woman is reassured that her outfit is not too much, that she looks more or less current. The clothes do not call attention to body shape; the size range is wide, the ethics sound; however, I have not bought it, because the clothes don't raise my pulse. (That would be ça va de soi.)
![]() |
Trudy Crane, artist and designer, age 63, in ça va de soi. |
At any year in the Passage, we need that frisson, at least some of the time—and more so as we accept our shifting bodies with kindness and compassion.
Comments
I HATE fashion. I do however love style. Now 83 (wherever did those years go?), I find myself back in the kind of clothes I wore in my late teens. Only then I was an oddity. Now it is perfectly normal to wear black pants with either a black tee or black polo neck (turtle neck across the ocean?). The only thing that has changed is that I now buy the best I can afford. I don't think my style of dressing is boring. It is after all a style.
Welcome back Duchesse. Thought provoking as always.